NATO ???
For one thing, NATO’s success led to a complete dissolution of the enemy it was created to deter, contain and defeat when the Soviet Union imploded two decades ago. Yet, NATO still remains a military alliance directed against very diaphanous and different threats. Thus, NATO has been struggling for a raison d’etre that recognizes traditional defense does not fit the broader security challenges and dangers that are in evidence, all the while expanding from 19 to 28 member nations.
The centerpiece of the alliance rests in Article V of the Washington Treaty: an attack on one in Europe or North America constitutes an attack against all. In conducting its business, consensus, meaning unanimity in agreement, has been the modus operandi. However, the definition of threat is not universally shared as many NATO members are more comfortable with traditional and proximate notions of territorial defense than with the newer expeditionary missions that have taken the alliance to its first ground war ever in Afghanistan, and with new threats from cyberattack and protection of critical infrastructure to responding to huge disasters whether of man or nature. And make no mistake. The future credibility and cohesion of the alliance rests on how well or how badly Afghanistan turns out — in any event likely to prove a “close run thing.”
Beyond these profound changes in the security environment, NATO must come to grips with other tough issues. In virtually all member states, defense spending is declining in difficult economic times. NATO’s bureaucratic organization is sclerotic and needs major overhaul. And in dealing with this array of daunting issues, as outgoing Supreme Allied Commander Army Gen. John Craddock has outspokenly observed, “NATO’s political leadership is often AWOL.”
The Leninist question of “what is to be done?” now confronts the alliance in developing a new strategic concept. But not everything is negative. NATO has proven to be the most successful military alliance in history. It has the best armed forces in the world, many of whom have seen active combat in Afghanistan and some in Iraq. And France, under the leadership of President Nicolas Sarkozy, has rejoined the military command structure.
A new leadership is taking over in the key leadership positions. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen will become the new secretary-general later this fall. U.S. Adm. James Stavridis is the new Supreme Allied Commander Europe, the first time a navy admiral has held that position. And in September, French Air Force Gen. Stephane Abrial will assume the duties of Supreme Allied Commander Transformation in Norfolk, Va., becoming the first non-American ever to hold that post.
Furthermore, NATO has just completed a major study on “Joint Futures” means to sketch out the range of threats facing the alliance from conventional to the more exotic, a very good first step in helping the alliance think through the nature of the dangers it is prepared to counter. Clearly, the shift from a defense-based to a broader security-based alliance is essential. However, given domestic politics in the 28 member states, while intellectually straightforward, if not done carefully, this transformation could be the political equivalent of leaping across the Grand Canyon in two single bounds.
In negotiating this transformation from defense to security as the basis for the alliance, history offers a tempting way forward. In the mid-1960s, the alliance was divided over conventional defense versus nuclear deterrence. With growing Soviet capabilities in both conventional and nuclear forces, the United States argued for stressing the former. The European allies, not wanting either a conventional war in their back yards or having to spend more on conventional forces, favored nuclear deterrence. The solution was “flexible response.”
Originally meant to defend across the entire conflict spectrum, the political brilliance of flexible response was that it allowed both sides of the Atlantic to emphasize their strategic preferences, relieving this political tension. What is needed is a new version of flexible response that enables member states to focus on the threats each view as most critical so the alliance is not forced into strategic platitudes or fundamental deadlock over the rationale underpinning the alliance. If this balance can be achieved, NATO could have at least another 60 years left. If not, we could end up reinventing an unsatisfactory replacement structure.
June 9, 2010 Posted by paragrapher | Politics | Abkhazia Viktor Yanukovych, Afghanistan, Africa, Al Qaeda, Angela Merkel, Azerbaijan, Barack Obama, Center, Challenge, China, COIN Piracy, Crisis, Defense, Dmitri Medvedev, Energy, Energy & Environment, EU, Eurasia, Europe, Eurozone, Financial, France, Freedom's, G20, Gazprom, Georgia, Germany, Global Business & Economics, Gordon Brown, Hillary Clinton, India, International, Interview, Iran, Israel, Joe Biden, Missile, NATO, NATO Forum, Nicolas Sarkozy, North Korea, Nuclear, Patriciu, Piracy Iraq, Poland, Proliferation, russia, Security, Somali, Somalia, South Asia, South Ossetia, Stanley McChrystal, Taliban Asia, Terrorism, Transatlantic Relations, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, UN, View from, Vladimir Putin, Weapons | 2 Comments
Categories
- 25 Best Cities for College Grads
- Africa
- America
- American Idol
- Apple
- Arts & Entertainment
- Astrology
- Automotive
- Beer
- Book
- Business
- Canada
- Cat
- Catering
- Celebrities
- China
- Chocolate
- Cinema
- Coffee
- Cold War
- Computers & Technology
- Credit
- Data Recovery
- Denmark
- Dog
- Elementary Workbooks
- Employment
- Europa
- Finance
- Food & Drink
- Games
- Graphic Design
- Hardware
- Health & Fitness
- Home & Family
- Humanities
- Humor
- Internet & Business Online
- Management
- mathematics
- Menopause
- Microsoft
- Mortgage
- Music
- Muslim world
- Networking
- News and Society
- Off Topig
- Pentatonic Scales
- Personal-Growth
- Pets & Animals
- Photography
- Poetry
- Poker
- Politics
- Programming
- Psychology
- Public Relations
- Reference & Education
- Reviews
- Russia
- Sexuality
- Small Business
- Software
- Sonography College
- South African
- Sports
- Sports & Recreation
- Spyware Removal
- Switzerland
- Tourist Economy
- Travel & Tourism
- Trucks
- turkey
- TV & Movies
- Uncategorized
- Vegetarian
- War
- Womens Issues
- World Trade Organization
-
Africa Arts & Entertainment Astrology Automotive Book Business Computers & Technology Employment Finance Food & Drink Games Health & Fitness Home & Family Internet & Business Online Management Mortgage Music Networking News and Society Off Topig Politics Programming Public Relations Reference & Education Reviews Sexuality Small Business Sports & Recreation Travel & Tourism Uncategorized
Search
Tag – Key
21st Century About Accounting Africa American Are Australia Auto Books Business by cat Changes Chocolate Collection Computer Coverage Credit Card Development Diamonds dog Economy EU food for Free Game guide Health human in Infection Insurance International Internet Jobs Libido Like Low Management Microsoft Music Networking New York Online PC Phone Politics popular Psychic School Services Sex sexy Social Software Some Spain Sports Technology Tension The Travel Traveling Turkey United States Way Wedding What Why with Work World you YourMeta
Blog Stats
- 9,569 hits
Profesyonel Seo Hizmeti
Googlede Birinci Sayfa Garantisi .. 0 506 785 67 85